OAMENII DE PAIE AI SERVICIILOR. Premierul Dacian Ciolos: au fost folosite CARTELE PREPAY din România in ATENTATE din Europa. Drept urmare, sa dam mai multe “INSTRUMENTE” serviciilor… “Mult inainte de a ne fi frica de teroristi, ar trebui sa ne temem de PUTEREA ABSOLUTA A SERVICIILOR SECRETE, NECONTROLATE DE NIMENI” (video)
- Hotnews: Dacian Ciolos: Inteleg ca in ultima vreme au fost folosite cartele prepay din Romania in pregatirea unor atentate in UE
Serviciile cer mai multe instrumente care sa le permita sa monitorizeze atent situatia de securitate, a declarat premierul Dacian Ciolos duminica, la ProTV, aratand ca o problema este reprezentata si de actualele prevederi privind vanzarea cartelelor pre-pay. Romania este, in acest moment, una dintre putinele tari din UE in care astfel de cartele pot fi achizitionate fara controale privind identitatea cumparatorului. In acest context, Ciolos a afirmat ca “au fost chiar folosite in ultima vreme cartele din Romania in pregatirea unor atentate in alta parte in UE, tocmai pentru ca exista aceasta flexibilitate in Romania”.
Principalele declaratii ale lui Dacian Ciolos:
Despre amenintarea terorista in UE:
- Stiti discutia veche cu cartelel prepayd, inteleg ca Romania este una dintre putinele tari din UE care vinde cartele pre-pay fara verificari de identitate. Sunt cateva lucruri care vor fi puse in discutie in perioada urmatoare.
- Inteleg ca au fost chiar folosite in ultima vreme cartele din Romania in pregatirea unor atentate in alta parte in UE tocmai pentru ca exista aceasta flexibilitate in Romania.
- Ministrul de Interne si cel al Justitiei vor veni cu propuneri de modificari legislative.
- Sa nu aiba cineva impresia ca vrem sa facem ceva pe ascuns. Cred ca e important sa discutam despre lucrurile acestea si sa invatam sa punem cursorul acolo unde trebuie.
- Nu trebuie sa ne ascundem dupa deget. Riscul exista. Suntem in Uniunea Europeana. Participam activ la lupta aceasta impotriva terorismului, deci potential riscul exista, insa asa cum stau lucrurile acum, ele sunt tinute sub control, in sensul ca autoritatile isi fac treaba.
- Eu din discutiile pe care le-am avut in aceasta saptamana cu autoritatile responsabile, si guvernamentale si serviciile de informatii, inteleg ca lucrurile sunt tinute sub control, dar, sigur, vigilenta este foarte mare
- Asupra Romaniei sunt consecintele pe care le vedem la nivelul UE, cresterea nivelului de teama, de alerta si raspunsuri coordonate.
- Ceea ce nu e usor, pentru ca toata discutia aceasta in jurul migratiei a creat sau a intarit disensiunile intre statele membre. Uniunea Europeana se afla intr-un moment dificil, de rascruce as spune, pentru ca avem nevoie de incredere si la nivelul leadershipului politic si intre statele membre, pentru ca riscul de disolutie in UE este mare si putem plati un pret foarte ridicat.
- O dezmembrare a UE inseamna control la frontiere, costuri mult mai mari, dreptul la munca in UE, costuri mai mari pentru protectie etc.
- Cred ca si cei care erau foarte deschisi in ultima vreme – Germania si tarile nordice – sunt mult mai circumspecti. S-a inteles in al 12-lea ceas ca fara un control al imigratiei ilegale nu putem vorbi despre solidaritate.
- Si noi am insistat pe un control al frontierelor externe ale UE. […]/ integral pe hotnews.ro
- CARTELE PREPAY DOAR CU BULETINUL? Nou proiect de lege initiat de acelasi deputat PDL care vrea sa condamne cersetoria (VIDEO)
- Curtea Constitutionala respinge si LEGEA PREPAY. Legea elimina ANONIMITATEA in privinta achizitionarii cartelelor telefonice preplatite
- Exact “la ţanc” pentru LEGILE BIG BROTHER: “ATACURI CIBERNETICE” CU MESAJE ISLAMISTE la o serie de siteuri institutionale raportate de SRI si ALARME FALSE cu bombe de pe… CARTELE PRE-PAY. Simple “intamplari” sau aplicarea principiului“noi centram, noi dam cu capul”?
- Presedinta Braziliei convoaca summit international pentru a contesta HEGEMONIA AMERICANA asupra INTERNETULUI/ O companie de telefonie mobila si mai multe ONG-uri CRITICA legea care desfiinteaza ANONIMITATEA cartelelor pre-pay
- CARTELE PRE-PAY DOAR CU BULETINUL: CSAT si Guvernul au decis ELIMINAREA ANONIMITATII si pentru cei CARE DETIN DEJA cartele preplatite. PONTA invoca MAROTA TERORISMULUI si minte senin… contrazicand insasi legea adoptata de el!
- Mircea Badea (VIDEO) despre cartelele pre-pay cu buletinul, SFARSITUL LIBERTATII si EVOLUTIA LUMII CATRE UN CONTROL TOTALITAR GENERALIZAT. Daca pana si necredinciosii vad si spun…
Categorii1. DIVERSE, Mircea Badea, Servicii secrete, Stat politienesc, Teroarea "terorismului", Tradatori si lichele, Video
Etichete (taguri)antiterorism, aparare antiterorista, ascultarea telefoanelor, atentate teroriste, cartele pre-pay, Dacian Ciolos, interceptari, Mircea Badea, securitate cibernetica, servicii secrete, SRI, terorism, teroristi, UE
8 Commentarii la “OAMENII DE PAIE AI SERVICIILOR. Premierul Dacian Ciolos: au fost folosite CARTELE PREPAY din România in ATENTATE din Europa. Drept urmare, sa dam mai multe “INSTRUMENTE” serviciilor… “Mult inainte de a ne fi frica de teroristi, ar trebui sa ne temem de PUTEREA ABSOLUTA A SERVICIILOR SECRETE, NECONTROLATE DE NIMENI” (video)”
“The world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.”
first Prime Minister of England,
in a novel he published in 1844 called
Coningsby, the New Generation
“The governments of the present day have to deal not merely with other governments, with emperors, kings and ministers, but also with the secret societies which have everywhere their unscrupulous agents, and can at the last moment upset all the governments’ plans. ”
British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli, 1876.
“Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men’s views confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that they better not speak above their breath when they speak in condemnation of it.”
Woodrow Wilson,The New Freedom (1913)
“The old world order changed when this war-storm broke. The old international order passed away as suddenly, as unexpectedly, and as completely as if it had been wiped out by a gigantic flood, by a great tempest, or by a volcanic eruption. The old world order died with the setting of that day’s sun and a new world order is being born while I speak, with birth-pangs so terrible that it seems almost incredible that life could come out of such fearful suffering and such overwhelming sorrow.”
Nicholas Murray Butler,
in an address delivered before the Union League of Philadelphia,
Nov. 27, 1915
“In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press….They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. “An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.”
U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917
“The peace conference has assembled. It will make the most momentous decisions in history, and upon these decisions will rest the stability of the new world order and the future peace of the world.”
M. C. Alexander,
Executive Secretary of the American Association for International Conciliation,
in a subscription letter for the periodical International Conciliation (1919)
“What is important is to dwell upon the increasing evidence of the existence of a secret conspiracy, throughout the world, for the destruction of organized government and the letting loose of evil.”
Christian Science Monitor editorial, June 19th, 1920
“From the days of Sparticus, Wieskhopf, Karl Marx, Trotsky, Rosa Luxemberg, and Emma Goldman, this world conspiracy has been steadily growing. This conspiracy played a definite recognizable role in the tragedy of the French revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th century. And now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their head and have become the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”
stated to the London Press, in 1922.
“The real menace of our republic is this invisible government which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy length over city, state and nation. Like the octopus of real life, it operates under cover of a self created screen….At the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both political parties.”
New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922
“If there are those who think we are to jump immediately into a new world order, actuated by complete understanding and brotherly love, they are doomed to disappointment. If we are ever to approach that time, it will be after patient and persistent effort of long duration. The present international situation of mistrust and fear can only be corrected by a formula of equal status, continuously applied, to every phase of international contacts, until the cobwebs of the old order are brushed out of the minds of the people of all lands.”
Dr. Augustus O. Thomas,
president of the World Federation of Education Associations (August 1927),
quoted in the book
International Understanding: Agencies Educating for a New World (1931)
“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world.”
Professor Arnold Toynbee,
in a June 1931 speech before
the Institute for the Study of International Affairs in Copenhagen.
“Fifty men have run America, and that’s a high figure.”
Joseph Kennedy, father of JFK,
in the July 26th, 1936 issue of The New York Times.
“… when the struggle seems to be drifting definitely towards a world social democracy, there may still be very great delays and disappointments before it becomes an efficient and beneficent world system. Countless people … will hate the new world order … and will die protesting against it. When we attempt to evaluate its promise, we have to bear in mind the distress of a generation or so of malcontents, many of them quite gallant and graceful-looking people.”
H. G. Wells,
in his book entitled The New World Order (1939)
“The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the larger centers has owned the Government ever since the days of Andrew Jackson.”
A letter written by FDR to Colonel House, November 21st, 1933
“For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But, he didn’t. Most of his thoughts, his political ammunition, as it were, were carefully manufactured for him in advanced by the Council on Foreign Relations-One World Money group. Brilliantly, with great gusto, like a fine piece of artillery, he exploded that prepared “ammunition” in the middle of an unsuspecting target, the American people, and thus paid off and returned his internationalist political support. “The UN is but a long-range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power. “The depression was the calculated ‘shearing’ of the public by the World Money powers, triggered by the planned sudden shortage of supply of call money in the New York money market….The One World Government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.”
FDR’s son-in-law as quoted in his book,
My Exploited Father-in-Law
Statements outright opposed to the NWO
“The term Internationalism has been popularized in recent years to cover an interlocking financial, political, and economic world force for the purpose of establishing a World Government. Today Internationalism is heralded from pulpit and platform as a ‘League of Nations’ or a ‘Federated Union’ to which the United States must surrender a definite part of its National Sovereignty. The World Government plan is being advocated under such alluring names as the ‘New International Order,’ ‘The New World Order,’ ‘World Union Now,’ ‘World Commonwealth of Nations,’ ‘World Community,’ etc. All the terms have the same objective; however, the line of approach may be religious or political according to the taste or training of the individual.”
Excerpt from A Memorial to be Addressed to
the House of Bishops and the House of Clerical and Lay Deputies
of the Protestant Episcopal Church in General Convention (October 1940)
“In the first public declaration on the Jewish question since the outbreak of the war, Arthur Greenwood, member without portfolio in the British War Cabinet, assured the Jews of the United States that when victory was achieved an effort would be made to found a new world order based on the ideals of ‘justice and peace.'”
Excerpt from article entitled
“New World Order Pledged to Jews,”
in The New York Times (October 1940)
“The government of the Western nations, whether monarchical or republican, had passed into the invisible hands of a plutocracy, international in power and grasp. It was, I venture to suggest, this semioccult power which….pushed the mass of the American people into the cauldron of World War I.”
British military historian MajorGeneral J.F.C. Fuller, 1941
“If totalitarianism wins this conflict, the world will be ruled by tyrants, and individuals will be slaves. If democracy wins, the nations of the earth will be united in a commonwealth of free peoples, and individuals, wherever found, will be the sovereign units of the new world order.”
The Declaration of the Federation of the World,
produced by the Congress on World Federation,
adopted by the Legislatures of
North Carolina (1941),
New Jersey (1942),
and possibly other states.
“New World Order Needed for Peace:
State Sovereignty Must Go,
Declares Notre Dame Professor”
Title of article in The Tablet (Brooklyn) (March 1942)
“Undersecretary of State Sumner Welles tonight called for the early creation of an international organization of anti-Axis nations to control the world during the period between the armistice at the end of the present war and the setting up of a new world order on a permanent basis.”
Text of article in The Philadelphia Inquirer (June 1942)
“The statement went on to say that the spiritual teachings of religion must become the foundation for the new world order and that national sovereignty must be subordinate to the higher moral law of God.”
American Institute of Judaism,
excerpt from article in The New York Times (December 1942)
“He [John Foster Dulles] stated directly to me that he had every reason to believe that the Governor [Thomas E. Dewey of New York] accepts his point of view and that he is personally convinced that this is the policy that he would promote with great vigor if elected. So it is fair to say that on the first round the Sphinx of Albany has established himself as a prima facie champion of a strong and definite new world order.”
Excerpt from article by Ralph W. Page
in The Philadelphia Bulletin (May 1944)
“There are some plain common-sense considerations applicable to all these attempts at world planning. They can be briefly stated: 1. To talk of blueprints for the future or building a world order is, if properly understood, suggestive, but it is also dangerous. Societies grow far more truly than they are built. A constitution for a new world order is never like a blueprint for a skyscraper.”
in his book What Is Our Destiny? (1944)
“We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by conquest or consent.”
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) member
to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee
on February 17th, 1950
“The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and exercise power from behind the scenes.”
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952
“Today the path of total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people. Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government – a bureaucratic elite.”
Senator William Jenner, 1954
“The most powerful clique in these (CFR) groups have one objective in common: they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the U.S. They want to end national boundaries and racial and ethnic loyalties supposedly to increase business and ensure world peace. What they strive for would inevitably lead to dictatorship and loss of freedoms by the people. The CFR was founded for “the purpose of promoting disarmament and submergence of U.S. sovereignty and national independence into an all-powerful one-world government.”
Harpers, July 1958
“The United Nations, he told an audience at Harvard University, ‘has not been able–nor can it be able–to shape a new world order which events so compellingly demand.’ … The new world order that will answer economic, military, and political problems, he said, ‘urgently requires, I believe, that the United States take the leadership among all free peoples to make the underlying concepts and aspirations of national sovereignty truly meaningful through the federal approach.'”
Gov. Nelson Rockefeller of New York,
in an article entitled “Rockefeller Bids Free Lands Unite:
Calls at Harvard for Drive to Build New World Order”
— The New York Times (February 1962)
“The case for government by elites is irrefutable”
Senator William Fulbright,
Former chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee,
stated at a 1963 symposium entitled:
The Elite and the Electorate – Is Government by the People Possible?
“The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system ,they will rule the future.”
U.S. Senator Barry Goldwater
in his 1964 book: With No Apologies.
“The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching aim, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements, arrived at in frequent private meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the worlds’ central banks which were themselves private corporations. The growth of financial capitalism made possible a centralization of world economic control and use of this power for the direct benefit of financiers and the indirect injury of all other economic groups.”
Tragedy and Hope: A History of The World in Our Time
(Macmillan Company, 1966,)
Professor Carroll Quigley of Georgetown University,
(highly esteemed by his former student,
William Jefferson Blythe Clinton.)
“The developing coherence of Asian regional thinking is reflected in a disposition to consider problems and loyalties in regional terms, and to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a new world order.”
Richard Nixon, in Foreign Affairs (October 1967)
“The Council on Foreign Relations is “the establishment.” Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also announces and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional Republic into a servile member state of a one-world dictatorship.”
Former Congressman John Rarick 1971
“He [President Nixon] spoke of the talks as a beginning, saying nothing more about the prospects for future contacts and merely reiterating the belief he brought to China that both nations share an interest in peace and building ‘a new world order.'”
Excerpt from an article in The New York Times (February 1972)
“If instant world government, Charter review, and a greatly strengthened International Court do not provide the answers, what hope for progress is there? The answer will not satisfy those who seek simple solutions to complex problems, but it comes down essentially to this: The hope for the foreseeable lies, not in building up a few ambitious central institutions of universal membership and general jurisdiction as was envisaged at the end of the last war, but rather in the much more decentralized, disorderly and pragmatic process of inventing or adapting institutions of limited jurisdiction and selected membership to deal with specific problems on a case-by-case basis … In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down. It will look like a great ‘booming, buzzing confusion,’ to use William James’ famous description of reality, but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”
Richard N. Gardner, in Foreign Affairs (April 1974)
“My country’s history, Mr. President, tells us that it is possible to fashion unity while cherishing diversity, that common action is possible despite the variety of races, interests, and beliefs we see here in this chamber. Progress and peace and justice are attainable. So we say to all peoples and governments: Let us fashion together a new world order.”
(in address before the General Assembly of the United Nations, October 1975)
“The existing order is breaking down at a very rapid rate, and the main uncertainty is whether mankind can exert a positive role in shaping a new world order or is doomed to await collapse in a passive posture. We believe a new order will be born no later than early in the next century and that the death throes of the old and the birth pangs of the new will be a testing time for the human species.”
Richard A. Falk,
in an article entitled
“Toward a New World Order: Modest Methods and Drastic Visions,”
in the book On the Creation of a Just World Order (1975)
“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”
Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976,
(killed in the Korean Airlines 747 that was shot down by the Soviets)
“The planning of UN can be traced to the ‘secret steering committee’ established by Secretary [of State Cordell] Hull in January 1943. All of the members of this secret committee, with the exception of Hull, a Tennessee politician, were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. They saw Hull regularly to plan, select, and guide the labors of the [State] Department’s Advisory Committee. It was, in effect, the coordinating agency for all the State Department’s postwar planning.”
Professors Laurence H. Shoup and William Minter,
writing in their study of the CFR,
“Imperial Brain Trust: The CFR and United States Foreign Policy.”
(Monthly Review Press, 1977).
“Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a new world order.”
in an address at the United Nations (December 1988)
“We believe we are creating the beginning of a new world order coming out of the collapse of the U.S.-Soviet antagonisms.”
Brent Scowcroft (August 1990),
quoted in The Washington Post (May 1991)
“We can see beyond the present shadows of war in the Middle East to a new world order where the strong work together to deter and stop aggression. This was precisely Franklin Roosevelt’s and Winston Churchill’s vision for peace for the post-war period.”
in The Wall Street Journal (September 1990)
“The world can therefore seize the opportunity [Persian Gulf crisis] to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind.”
George Herbert Walker Bush
“If we do not follow the dictates of our inner moral compass and stand up for human life, then his lawlessness will threaten the peace and democracy of the emerging new world order we now see, this long dreamed-of vision we’ve all worked toward for so long.”
President George Bush (January 1991)
“But it became clear as time went on that in Mr. Bush’s mind the New World Order was founded on a convergence of goals and interests between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, so strong and permanent that they would work as a team through the U.N. Security Council.”
Excerpt from A. M. Rosenthal,
in The New York Times (January 1991)
“I would support a Presidential candidate who pledged to take the following steps: … At the end of the war in the Persian Gulf, press for a comprehensive Middle East settlement and for a ‘new world order’ based not on Pax Americana but on peace through law with a stronger U.N. and World Court.”
in The New York Times (February 1991)
“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in past centuries.”
( founder of the Trilateral Commission),
in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission,
in June, 1991.
“Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order [referring to the 1991 LA Riot]. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond [i.e., an “extraterrestrial” invasion], whether real or *promulgated* [emphasis by original compiler], that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this *scenario*, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government.”
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
“In the next century, nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all.”
President Clinton’s Deputy Secretary of State,
as quoted in Time, July 20th, 1992.
“How to Achieve The New World Order”
Title of book excerpt by Henry Kissinger,
in Time magazine (March 1994)
“The new world order that is in the making must focus on the creation of a world of democracy, peace and prosperity for all.”
in The Philadelphia Inquirer (October 1994)
“The Final Act of the Uruguay Round, marking the conclusion of the most ambitious trade negotiation of our century, will give birth – in Morocco – to the World Trade Organization, the third pillar of the New World Order, along with the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund.”
Part of full-page advertisement
by the government of Morocco
in The New York Times (April 1994)
“New World Order: The Rise of the Region-State”
Title of article by Kenichi Ohmae,
political reform leader in Japan,
in The Wall Street Journal (August 1994)
“We are not going to achieve a new world order without paying for it in blood as well as in words and money.”
Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., in Foreign Affairs (July/August 1995)
“Alchemy for a New World Order”
Article by Stephen John Stedman
in Foreign Affairs (May/June 1995)
“The idea was that those who direct the overall conspiracy could use the differences in those two so-called ideologies [marxism/fascism/socialism v. democracy/capitalism] to enable them [the Illuminati] to divide larger and larger portions of the human race into opposing camps so that they could be armed and then brainwashed into fighting and destroying each other.”
Am intrat in perioada in care “Alegerea alesilor” nu mai are nici o relevanta in tot acest simulacru.
“România este în pericol de a-și pierde democrația, iar pericolul este generat de ideea înființării Comitetului Național pentru Supravegherea Macroprudențială, care să nu răspundă în fața nici unei instituții cu reprezentanți aleși democratic.
El va avea un consiliu general format din nouă membri: cinci de la Banca Naţională, doi de la Autoritatea de Supraveghere Financiară şi doi de la Guvern.
Preşedinte va fi guvernatorul Băncii Naţionale, Mugur Isărescu.”
“A se observa că, în baza art. 10 alin.2 din această minunată lege a unei minunate lumi noi, “recomandările şi avertizările emise nu se publică în cazul în care publicarea acestora poate avea repercusiuni la adresa stabilităţii financiare”.
Aşadar, sub masca atenţiei pentru stabilitate financiară, se pot emite orice fel de recomandări şi avertizări – noi nu vom şti niciodată de ce unele legi vor fi fost respinse ori modificate după recomandările comitetului şi de ce unele soluţii judiciare vor fi fost luate după aceleaşi recomandări. Nu vom şti de ce vor fi fost salvate bănci falite sau asigurători frauduloşi cu riscul falimentului şi al ruinei cetăţenilor.
Căci, acest comitet este, nu-i aşa, coordonatorul gestiunii crizelor financiare (art.3 alin.5 din “lege”), iar noi, plebea, nu trebuie să ne punem prea multe întrebări. Tocmai de aceea, Comitetul nu solicită şi nu acceptă instrucţiuni din partea niciunei autorităţi, instituţii, organism public ori privat, nici măcar de la Parlament sau puterea judecătorească.”